There ain't no news in being good.
- Finley Peter Dunne

In embryo...

This blog started out as an assignment from my Comms:239 professor, Dr. Cressman (what up Cress?!). We were supposed to use it to talk about journalism in the news...changes, scandals, technologies, etc. Now, I'm not sure what it is. I guess it is whatever I want it to be at any given time of the day. It's still developing, still finding it's niche, still in embryo....

News from CNN.com

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Crowdsourcing

So, somehow I've stumbled upon an interesting website, KCNN.org, which will probably be providing me with an abundance of stuff to blog about.
Today I want to talk about a term I've never head before, called "crowdsourcing."

Has anybody else heard this term?


Basically it is in reference to using crowds, or the people, for information. In other words it means, "asking your readers, or your audience, to help you solve a problem."

Reporters are supposed to build a list of solid sources from which to get the best information for our stories. The way these guys talk about crowdsourcing is basically a lot like CNN's "IReport." Asking the people to feed you news and stories. But, is the general public a good source?

Anybody can be a source. Does that mean they can be a good source?

As journalists we often get the cold shoulder and find it challenging to get "inside" and get the real story. One pro of crowdsourcing, advocated by KCNN, is that it is an effective tool when "you have people inside an organization who may not be reachable through normal channels by a reporter."

But, the article is also quick to say, "Verify. Verify. Verify." Just a new website and a new term I wanted to throw out there to the masses of 239.

1 comment:

melinda said...

'crowdsourcing' is an interesting idea, but it seems like it would be really hard to verify facts that have been obtained from random civilians. those fact checkers for iReport must have their work cut out for them!